Hvorfor er E.Musk forblændet af DT?

Musk On Bringing Trump Back To Twitter: ‘It Was Not Correct’ To Ban Him

Kathy D

54 minutes ago“In one of the first tests of freedom of speech, the House passed the Sedition Act, permitting the deportation, fine, or imprisonment of anyone deemed a threat or publishing “false, scandalous, or malicious writing” against the government of the United States.”

—[This was a comment on YouTube to the video.]—

Donald Axel

1 second ago [Svar til:] @Kathy D [quote from Wikipedia] In 1798, President John Adams signed the Alien and Sedition Acts, which were passed by the Federalist-dominated 5th United States Congress.[1][a] They made it harder for an immigrant to become a citizen (Naturalization Act), allowed the president to imprison and deport non-citizens who were known as dangerous … or who were from a hostile nation (“Alien Enemies Act” of 1798),[3] and criminalized making ‘false statements’ critical of the federal government [Wikip.]

[Svar til:] @Kathy D :: So the problem is that the President is above the common man in one respect, namely you can’t drag him to court for “normal crimes” like fraud and money-laundering, you need to establish he has dementia or is a traitor. And I am not sure why it isn’t obvious from the speeches DT made that he IS a traitor, but apparently the political system is hesitant about bringing him to a court martial. There are many explanations, all working against a fast process for a presidential traitor.

The most problematic is that he still has many followers, even politicians in the GOP who earlier called DT a demagogue, criminal, traitor and all, Putin’s lapdog or what not.

To many of us this number of followers is extremely perplexing. This is civil war of a kind.

---

Ville du købe en Tesla efter at Musk har sagt at han vil tillade DT propagandere på Twitter?

Hvor mange år er der tilbage før DT ikke orker mere?